In the article " cheese monkeys" by Chip Kidd, I found his article to be very engaging. The way he writes as if he was talking to you in person is very interesting. He made you think, it seemed like he was going through schooling at the time or maybe he was writing in the mindset of a professor. I enjoyed reading the part when Kidd talks about basic ideas like right to left, top to bottom, big and small, front to back, and even form.
That was something I did not understand. I realized this was a "Basic Interlude" but I feel like i did not get much from this reading. I was unsure about the whole theme in this writing actually. So overall I did not like this reading because I was confused most of the reading about what he was talking about . I wish he was more clear about the overall concept during this article.
I like how the author described the basketball shot made by Julius Erving, he painted a picture in your head and made you feel as if you were actually at the game. I think that the writer was trying to explain that rules whether good or bad can restrict or stop someone in someway from doing what they truly want. Pollock states that it is ok to drip paint and not be perfect and then this is turned into strict rule requiring you to be a little messy to be accepted.
I am not a fan of basketball so some things were hard to follow. I don't agree with how the author compared basketball over religion. I myself am not a religious person, but I don't think those two go hand in hand at all. Although the author did a great job at putting a picture in your head with his descriptive wording, I think comparing basketball and how obsessed he seemed with it was a turn off for this reading.
In the article “Why is This Man Smiling?” by Lawrence Weschler. I enjoyed this article more than the rest immediately because of the pictures this article had. I thought it was interesting how the author explained the complexity of being a digital animator and making sure the right emotion is portrayed at all times. “ The face's 44 muscles are capable of producing some 5,000 different expressions.”
I did not like how some sentences were very bizarre. Some sentences i had no idea what the author was trying to say at all because of that. I also did not enjoy reading the slang terms in this reading. It made it seem very unprofessional considering it’s a published article.